Doing it right will take more time than you think!
AI summaries miss technical context and important points
Scientific articles mostly follow this structure:
Scientific articles mostly follow this structure:
| Abstract | Very technical and concise |
| Introduction | Definitions and context, motivation |
| Methods | Data collection, some statistics |
| Results | Interpretation/significance tests |
| Discussion/ Conclusion | What does it mean? Why does it matter? |
| References | What work is this related to? How well established are the methods? |
| Supplement | Code, data, stuff reviewers wanted, things that didn’t fit page limit… |
Technical reports have a more varied structure:
Executive Summary
Contents
Introduction
Body - broken into sections
Conclusions
References/Bibliography
Appendices
Technical reports have a more varied structure:
Executive Summary (for dummies)
Contents preview of what you’re in for
Introduction
Body - broken into sections
Conclusions
References/Bibliography
Appendices technical documentation, related documents, stuff to bury so management doesn’t see it CYA
Read the title
Read the conclusion
Skim the methods
Skim the results
Can you answer your assembled questions?
What do you not understand (yet)?
Vocabulary? Google/Dictionary/Reference book
How they came to the conclusion?
Why this topic is interesting?
🔝 In order, this time
🎶️ Margin notes - ask questions (for you or the author)!
Liberally comment
✏️ Highlight/underline key points, definitions that are new to you
highlighting everything doesn’t work that well - be selective!
Abstract - teaser for the full paper
Make sure you understand at least what the abstract covers
Conclusion
Do you understand how/why the authors came to their conclusions?
How does this paper fit into the wider field?
Read the introduction (NOT the abstract)
Identify the big question
Summarize the background in <5 sentences
Read the methods
Identify the specific question(s)
Identify the approach
Draw a diagram (for experiments) showing process/methods
Read the results
Summarize results for each experiment
Do results answer the specific question(s)?
Read the conclusion/discussion
What contribution does this make?
What follow-up experiments are necessary?
Read the abstract
What do other researchers say about this paper?
Authors, institutional affiliations
Journal
Look at charts/pictures
Read conclusions
Look at tables
Read the report
Read the executive summary
State the motivation/research question
What hypotheses were tested? What solutions were considered?
What methods/experimental designs were used?
What were the results? Significance?
Why does it matter? What is the implication?
Read your summary out loud (or have the computer read it to you)
Re-read/skim the article again
Read your summary after you revisit the article
Did you cover all of the important points?
What assumptions did you make about your audience?
Eliminate wordiness
extra adverbs (“clearly”, “very”, “mostly”) and weasel words should go
Use specific language
“this experiment illustrates” instead of “this illustrates”
Accurate language
“fail to reject” instead of “support for the null”
Don’t use direct quotes – summaries are more concise than the original
Ask yourself “Do I need this word?”